December 2021

S M T W T F S
   1234
567 8910 11
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728 293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Friday, July 24th, 2020 10:52 pm
Huh.
Trying to do a sex partner tally.
(Was on OkCupid reviewing match questions with someone)

I think I've only had sex with 17 people, if I define sex as, "everyone was willing and at least one orgasm occurred."

That is 17 in 32 years.
I need to think about, do I have feelings about that. And if so, what feelings do I have?

Hmmmmm
Saturday, July 25th, 2020 08:22 am (UTC)
For whatever good an external opinion is worth: that number doesn't seem high enough or low enough that I'd know *what* the "obvious" external criticism of it would look like.

I can think of people who would say "too high" or "too low" about it, but that says more about them (and/or me) than it does about the number.
Saturday, July 25th, 2020 08:31 am (UTC)
Is that 32 as in you’re 32, or 32 as in that’s the number of years since you started having sex? It doesn’t ‘matter’ either way of course, just curious.

My number is a lot higher, but in the last 12 years it’s been 9 people I think, so I’ve slowed down massively. I think about whether I’m satisfied with where I am now and what I want sex+me to look like from here :)
Saturday, July 25th, 2020 09:51 am (UTC)
I'm at just the one, so it always feels as though discussion of the subject is violating privacy, on account of that there's no plausible deniability about whom I am speaking. Collectively all y'alls don't need my partner's info or the bulk of our stories, and there's a tiny bit of squick re: the concept of other people's specific info.
Saturday, July 25th, 2020 02:39 pm (UTC)
I just appreciate that we have such similar definitions.

Externally, that number is a lovely prime number, but all of your feelings about it are valid and worthy.
Saturday, July 25th, 2020 05:55 pm (UTC)
I love your definition. Me: 19.

I’m now musing on the fact that my numbers change immensely based on whose orgasm I’m counting. I hadn’t realized the difference was quite so.. dramatic. Me if we count MY orgasms: 7.
Edited 2020-07-25 05:55 pm (UTC)
Saturday, July 25th, 2020 10:19 pm (UTC)
Interestingly. By my definition of sex I’ve had sex with someone. By theirs I haven’t. And the difference was in the orgasm occurring (or not, in this case!)
Sunday, July 26th, 2020 01:46 am (UTC)
Huh.
A) That's the sort of match question I used to skip.

B) We have different definitions of sex. I don't know what my definition currently is, but orgasm isn't a requirement, just a clarifying aspect. Which is in no way a judgement on your definition. Your definition is much handier.
Edited 2020-07-26 01:48 am (UTC)
Sunday, July 26th, 2020 01:50 am (UTC)
PS: I'm here for any and all feelings you have about your numbers. I have recently been having feelings about the rate of change I have experienced in my numbers at various points in my life.
Sunday, July 26th, 2020 04:39 am (UTC)
I mean, I'm at 4, with 12 years of being sexually active.

The partner is at 16 for 14 years.

I don't think there's a "right" or "wrong" answer. :)
Tuesday, July 28th, 2020 03:10 am (UTC)
for what it's worth that does not seem remarkable in either the unexpectedly-high or unexpectedly-low direction to me (my number is 12 which is honestly more than past me would have expected). if it has led you to muse that in retrospect you would have liked to have more sex and more partners in your life, that is also fair and valid.
Tuesday, July 28th, 2020 08:00 pm (UTC)
I think I'm around 18 myself. I know people for whom that is an incredibly high number, and I know others who are reaching for or into the triple digits who surpassed my number before they were out of college (at the usual age for such things).

I know I once had a problem with what seemed like large numbers, but I was pretty freshly out of a southern baptist home life at the time that was true. I don't really have feelings around the number now.

(icon choice to match yours, although I could never match that cleavage! *fans self*)