Huh.
Trying to do a sex partner tally.
(Was on OkCupid reviewing match questions with someone)
I think I've only had sex with 17 people, if I define sex as, "everyone was willing and at least one orgasm occurred."
That is 17 in 32 years.
I need to think about, do I have feelings about that. And if so, what feelings do I have?
Hmmmmm
Trying to do a sex partner tally.
(Was on OkCupid reviewing match questions with someone)
I think I've only had sex with 17 people, if I define sex as, "everyone was willing and at least one orgasm occurred."
That is 17 in 32 years.
I need to think about, do I have feelings about that. And if so, what feelings do I have?
Hmmmmm
Tags:
no subject
I can think of people who would say "too high" or "too low" about it, but that says more about them (and/or me) than it does about the number.
no subject
My number is a lot higher, but in the last 12 years it’s been 9 people I think, so I’ve slowed down massively. I think about whether I’m satisfied with where I am now and what I want sex+me to look like from here :)
no subject
your last sentence there: being satisfied (or not) and what I want sex to look, feel, be like for myself... that's really the point.
and i need to figure out how to better communicate around sex. I missed my shot on at least two occasions in the last few years where I really wanted that connection with someone but was too ...dense, or too convinced /they couldn't possibly want me/?
ARGH.
no subject
no subject
it's on the consent spectrum.
and definitely you shouldn't have to hear tmi you don't want in your brain, but i understand how some folks overshare (including me at some inopportune moments over my lifetime, but I've definitely also had that inflicted on me at times I Did Not Want.)
no subject
Externally, that number is a lovely prime number, but all of your feelings about it are valid and worthy.
no subject
I think I like the term "sexytimes" more than "sex" these days. Sexytimes includes kissing, flirting, dancing together meaningfully, eyefucking, teasing. Like a whole RANGE of activities, not just orgasm-driven behaviour.
and thanks for the reassurance (it IS a lovely prime number!)
no subject
I’m now musing on the fact that my numbers change immensely based on whose orgasm I’m counting. I hadn’t realized the difference was quite so.. dramatic. Me if we count MY orgasms: 7.
no subject
no subject
A) That's the sort of match question I used to skip.
B) We have different definitions of sex. I don't know what my definition currently is, but orgasm isn't a requirement, just a clarifying aspect. Which is in no way a judgement on your definition. Your definition is much handier.
no subject
no subject
The partner is at 16 for 14 years.
I don't think there's a "right" or "wrong" answer. :)
no subject
And if I sit a little bit more, I can tell that what *I* want, isn't a competition, isn't notches on the bedpost. I don't want to be "sluttier" or lower my standards, I don't think I *could* anyway. I can't get it up unless I care about someone and like them a lot.
I think I just need to sit more, maybe write more, about what "having a number" means to me, while teasing out what I think this puritanical gynophobic culture tries to sneak into our heads about women and sex and value and worth.
There. That feels right.
no subject
no subject
I know I once had a problem with what seemed like large numbers, but I was pretty freshly out of a southern baptist home life at the time that was true. I don't really have feelings around the number now.
(icon choice to match yours, although I could never match that cleavage! *fans self*)
nice icon!
ty for the compliment!
i have a new crocheted halter that's really quite flattering. I should think about taking some more photos of me in that.
i think the whole question of "what's your number" is likely one branch of the traditional puritannical slut shaming and gynophobia and I think I'm glad I don't really seem to feel any kind of way about it anymore.