Huh.
Trying to do a sex partner tally.
(Was on OkCupid reviewing match questions with someone)
I think I've only had sex with 17 people, if I define sex as, "everyone was willing and at least one orgasm occurred."
That is 17 in 32 years.
I need to think about, do I have feelings about that. And if so, what feelings do I have?
Hmmmmm
Trying to do a sex partner tally.
(Was on OkCupid reviewing match questions with someone)
I think I've only had sex with 17 people, if I define sex as, "everyone was willing and at least one orgasm occurred."
That is 17 in 32 years.
I need to think about, do I have feelings about that. And if so, what feelings do I have?
Hmmmmm
Tags:
no subject
I can think of people who would say "too high" or "too low" about it, but that says more about them (and/or me) than it does about the number.
no subject
My number is a lot higher, but in the last 12 years it’s been 9 people I think, so I’ve slowed down massively. I think about whether I’m satisfied with where I am now and what I want sex+me to look like from here :)
no subject
no subject
Externally, that number is a lovely prime number, but all of your feelings about it are valid and worthy.
no subject
I’m now musing on the fact that my numbers change immensely based on whose orgasm I’m counting. I hadn’t realized the difference was quite so.. dramatic. Me if we count MY orgasms: 7.
no subject
no subject
A) That's the sort of match question I used to skip.
B) We have different definitions of sex. I don't know what my definition currently is, but orgasm isn't a requirement, just a clarifying aspect. Which is in no way a judgement on your definition. Your definition is much handier.
no subject
no subject
The partner is at 16 for 14 years.
I don't think there's a "right" or "wrong" answer. :)
no subject
And if I sit a little bit more, I can tell that what *I* want, isn't a competition, isn't notches on the bedpost. I don't want to be "sluttier" or lower my standards, I don't think I *could* anyway. I can't get it up unless I care about someone and like them a lot.
I think I just need to sit more, maybe write more, about what "having a number" means to me, while teasing out what I think this puritanical gynophobic culture tries to sneak into our heads about women and sex and value and worth.
There. That feels right.
no subject
no subject
I know I once had a problem with what seemed like large numbers, but I was pretty freshly out of a southern baptist home life at the time that was true. I don't really have feelings around the number now.
(icon choice to match yours, although I could never match that cleavage! *fans self*)
nice icon!
ty for the compliment!
i have a new crocheted halter that's really quite flattering. I should think about taking some more photos of me in that.
i think the whole question of "what's your number" is likely one branch of the traditional puritannical slut shaming and gynophobia and I think I'm glad I don't really seem to feel any kind of way about it anymore.
no subject
your last sentence there: being satisfied (or not) and what I want sex to look, feel, be like for myself... that's really the point.
and i need to figure out how to better communicate around sex. I missed my shot on at least two occasions in the last few years where I really wanted that connection with someone but was too ...dense, or too convinced /they couldn't possibly want me/?
ARGH.
no subject
it's on the consent spectrum.
and definitely you shouldn't have to hear tmi you don't want in your brain, but i understand how some folks overshare (including me at some inopportune moments over my lifetime, but I've definitely also had that inflicted on me at times I Did Not Want.)
no subject
I think I like the term "sexytimes" more than "sex" these days. Sexytimes includes kissing, flirting, dancing together meaningfully, eyefucking, teasing. Like a whole RANGE of activities, not just orgasm-driven behaviour.
and thanks for the reassurance (it IS a lovely prime number!)